Aston Martin

F1 2026Összértékelés: 2.0/10

Fernando Alonso

Aktuális +0.93 · Forma 0.00

Lance Stroll

Aktuális -0.09 · Forma 0.00

Időmérős alap

1.9

Verseny alap

2.4

Autó jellemzők

Időmérős tempó

1.9

Versenytempó

2.4

Csúcsleszorítóerő

3.9

Gyors kanyarok

2.3

Lassú kanyarok

2.8

Egyenesbeli sebesség

2.3

Aktív aero hatékonyság

2.5

Gumikopás-kezelés

3.2

Tapadás

2.1

Fékstabilitás

2.6

Útfekvés

1.6

Energia-visszanyerés

1.8

Megbízhatóság

1.2

Aston Martin is facing a genuine car crisis. The AMR26 has produced attributes that rank at or near the worst on the grid in almost every measurable dimension. Energy recovery, ride quality, and reliability are all in serious trouble, and the race pace reflects it. This is not a car that is slightly off the pace. It is a car that is fundamentally misconfigured for the 2026 regulations. Alonso's driver offset is the team's single meaningful performance asset, and it is doing extraordinary work to produce any results at all.

Részletes elemzés

The reliability numbers demand attention for anyone predicting Aston Martin finishes. A car with reliability rated at the bottom of the field will fail to finish races at a frequency that no other team matches, and those mechanical retirements cannot be anticipated from track position or session pace. Energy recovery is the worst on the grid, which in 2026's hybrid formula means the car is surrendering time on every straight on every lap. The compounding nature of that deficit makes it particularly damaging. It is not a one-sector problem, it is a whole-lap problem.

Alonso's offset is, in raw numerical terms, comparable to world-champion-level extraction, which means he is doing everything possible with a broken tool. His qualifying performances occasionally produce grid positions that seem disconnected from race pace reality, and his racecraft converts those positions into the best possible finishing result, but the car's limitations always reassert themselves over a full race distance. Stroll's near-zero offset ensures his results closely match what the car is capable of without driver intervention. For Aston Martin, the most useful prediction framework is: Alonso will consistently outperform the car's rating, Stroll will not, and both will face mechanical retirement risk that is higher than any other team.

Fejlesztési idővonal

Round 0Pre-Season

2.8

Pre-season baseline — Honda PU crisis, catastrophic testing programme

race Pace 0.0traction -2.5quali Pace 0.0reliability -3.2ride Quality -3.0peak Downforce -1.2energy Recovery -3.0low Speed Corners -1.8tyre Degradation -1.8braking Stability -1.7high Speed Corners -1.7straight Line Speed -2.5active Aero Efficiency -1.8

By far the worst pre-season of any team. Honda PU suffered persistent and unresolved issues: 'abnormal vibrations' with root cause not identified (The Race), battery pack shaking, power deficit, and efficiency shortfall. Only 334 total laps across both Bahrain tests — worst of any team. Completed just 6 laps on the final day due to lack of spare parts (The Race, ESPN). Drivers reported extreme vibrations transmitted to the chassis raising safety fears — ESPN reported concerns about 'permanent nerve damage' to Alonso and Stroll. reliability rated 1.8 — catastrophically low, lowest single attribute in the entire grid. rideQuality 2.0 due to the vibration issue. energyRecovery 2.0 reflecting Honda PU being 'down on power and efficiency' (PlanetF1). Honda themselves said 'we are not happy with our performance and our reliability.' peakDownforce rated 3.8 — highest of Aston Martin's attributes — because Adrian Newey's AMR26 aero design is theoretically competent but completely untested due to severe running limitations. AMR26 was described as 'too slow and very difficult to drive' (The Race). Honda co-signed the joint letter to the FIA protesting Mercedes' compression ratio loophole, but Honda's own PU issues are far more immediate than the Mercedes rivalry.

Australian Grand PrixBaseline

2.5

Round 1 baseline — Honda PU crisis continues, nerve damage concerns, both cars effectively DNF

race Pace +0.5traction -0.3quali Pace +0.3reliability -0.3ride Quality 0.0peak Downforce 0.0energy Recovery -0.2low Speed Corners -0.4tyre Degradation 0.0braking Stability -0.5high Speed Corners -0.8straight Line Speed 0.0active Aero Efficiency -0.7

Honda PU vibrations (ICE + MGU) so severe drivers limited to ~25 laps (Alonso) / ~15 laps (Stroll) to avoid permanent nerve damage. Stroll: 'like electrocuting yourself on a chair.' Only 2 working batteries. Alonso zero FP1 laps, P17 in Q1, retired L21. Stroll no quali time, P17 (+15 laps). Race pace 86.387 (+2.889) with worst degradation on grid (positive 0.16). Newey: 'the chassis is the receiver.' Sources: Motorsport.com, The Race, GPFans, Formula1.com.

Chinese Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.4

Round 2 — double DNF continues, Alonso vibration crisis, Honda battery failure

race Pace -0.5quali Pace -0.1reliability -0.3ride Quality -0.3

Second consecutive double DNF. Stroll's battery failure on lap 10 triggered the Safety Car — first Honda PU-failure of 2026, tagged 'monitoring'. Alonso retired lap 34 with vibrations so severe he lost feeling in his hands and feet — direct rideQuality evidence. 3.946s race pace deficit is worst of any team with representative laps. Honda PU crisis continues to overshadow Newey's chassis design. Sources: Formula1.com, The Race, Motorsport.com, GPFans.

Japanese Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.4

Round 3 — Alonso completes first full race, Stroll DNF continues, new front wing + floor

race Pace -0.3quali Pace -0.4reliability +0.1ride Quality +0.1peak Downforce +0.1

Alonso completed first full race distance with Honda PU — a milestone after consecutive double-DNFs. Vibrations 'more manageable' at Suzuka (rideQuality slight improvement). Stroll DNF'd lap 30 (water pressure issue). Race pace +3.668s (slowest team, behind Cadillac). Upgrades: new front wing (load shifting) + new floor (downforce gain). Worst clipping delta on grid (-60 km/h, Honda PU energy management). Sources: PlanetF1, Motorsport.com, Sky Sports, FastF1 data.

Miami Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.4

Round 6 (Miami) — only team with zero chassis upgrades, structural decline continues

race Pace +0.6quali Pace +0.3

Only team to bring no chassis upgrades to Miami. Honda PU hardware tweak (vibration-related) deployed but awaiting FIA-eligible PU performance update — no performance gain this weekend. 'Eye-wateringly low' top speeds per F1i. Both classified as lapped finishers (ALO P15, STR P17) — neither retired, both 1 lap down at chequered. FastF1 status 'dnf' is a lapped-classified artifact, not a retirement. Race pace gap +2.991s — worst non-Cadillac, gap is widening structurally. No incidents this weekend (reliability holds at 1.3 — already grid-worst). No car-DNA changes warranted given zero upgrades + no new pattern signals. Pipeline will reflect any minor racePace drift from raw data. Sources: RaceFans, GPFans Honda Miami no-upgrades, PlanetF1.

Canadian Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.4

Round 7 (Canada) — no upgrades, ALO seat retirement on Montreal kerbs

race Pace -0.7quali Pace +0.1ride Quality -0.2

No upgrades brought to Canada. STR started from the pit lane (engine elements changed under parc fermé). ALO DNF lap 23 — physical pain from a reclined-cockpit seat amplified by Montreal kerb vibrations ('stopped to stop the pain'). This is the 3rd Alonso DNF in 5 races but qualitatively a one-off chassis/ergonomic issue (team will rework cockpit by Monaco), not the existing AM PU/cooling pattern. Reliability NOT moved by this incident — patternFlag null in the incident log, no rating ding. rideQuality −0.2 to reflect that the kerbs literally caused a driver to retire from physical pain. Race pace gap to fastest widened to 4.88s — package-less Aston is falling further behind.

Barcelona Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.2

Round 9 (Barcelona) - grid-worst by 4.1s (P21/P22, behind Cadillac by >1s), double DNF, zero upgrades registered

race Pace -0.1traction -0.1quali Pace -0.4reliability -0.1braking Stability -0.2high Speed Corners -0.2

Worst weekend of any team: +4.1s off pole, only team starting on hards, both cars retired, nothing registered with the FIA ('it's the worst car, married to the worst engine' - Alonso; treading water for the Newey push). Cited weaknesses at this track type: high-speed performance -> highSpeedCorners -0.2, brake locking -> brakingStability -0.2, traction -> traction -0.1 (multi-source: Alonso quotes + The Race). Reliability -0.3 at the floor: STR gearbox L5 + ALO Honda battery L37 (second Honda battery/ERS failure of the season after STR R2) + parc-ferme PU change (pit-lane start) + quali throttle anomalies - team thread systemic. Net -0.1 after re-center. Grid reliability re-center +0.2 applied to all 11 teams (incident penalties pushed the grid reliability average to 4.33, breaching the +/-0.5 band; re-centered to 4.53, relative gaps preserved). Pipeline re-derives qualiPace/racePace from committed raw round-09; no manual pace override (dry, representative weekend). Sources: FastF1 round-09; The Race; Wikipedia.

Austrian Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.1

Round 10 (Austria) - worst weekend again: Q21/Q22 behind Cadillac, ALO three laps down, STR ERS DNF (3rd Honda battery/ERS event)

race Pace -0.1quali Pace -0.2

ALO Q21 at 5.79% off pole (~1s behind Cadillac), P18 three laps down in the heat; STR Q22, ERS failure L45. No upgrades registered (deliberate Newey single-batch strategy; team cites Honda PU fixes as the early-season focus). No performance-attribute changes - R9 already cut HSC/BS/TR and the derived pace baseline captures the qualifying deficit. Reliability: STR ERS = third Honda battery/ERS event of the season (STR R2, ALO R9, STR R10), systemic thread continues; -0.2 pre-re-center (floor-bounded at grid-worst rather than the strict second-failure step) cancelled to net 0.0 by the +0.2 grid re-center - reliability stays 1.2. Overall -0.1 on the continuing decline. ALO's claimed energy-deployment progress is single-source - noted, no energyRecovery credit. Grid reliability re-center +0.2 applied to all 11 teams (R10 incident penalties pushed the grid reliability average to 4.36, breaching the +/-0.5 band; re-centered to 4.56, relative gaps preserved). Pipeline re-derives qualiPace/racePace from committed raw round-10; no manual pace override (dry, representative weekend). Sources: FastF1 round-10; F1.com; Honda Racing; Wikipedia.

British Grand PrixWeekend Final

2.0

Round 11 (Silverstone) - grid-worst by a distance; Honda PU pool penalty extends systemic thread

race Pace -0.3quali Pace -0.1straight Line Speed -0.2

Grid-worst by a distance again: quali +4.7s off pole, race median +5.138 (last), both cars lapped (raw 'dnf' at lap 51 = lapped-finisher artifact; ALO P18 / STR P19 finished). straightLineSpeed -0.2: catastrophic trap deficit - slowest two in SQ (ALO 306 / STR 303 km/h vs Ferrari's 323); SQ-only sourced, sized within the single-point cap. Reliability: STR 10-place grid penalty for exceeding Honda PU element allocation at round 9 of 22 (real-world numbering) - pool consumption extends the Honda battery/ERS systemic thread without an on-track failure; -0.1 pre-re-center, floor-bounded, net 0.0 after the +0.1 grid re-center. ALO sprint spin was PER contact damage - not at fault, sprint pace discounted; STR track-limits penalties driver error. Zero upgrades - package explicitly deferred to Hungary; watch for a step there. Grid reliability re-center +0.1 applied to all 11 teams (R11 incident penalties pushed the grid reliability average to 4.45, breaching the +/-0.5 band; re-centered to 4.55, relative gaps preserved). Sources: FastF1 round-11; F1.com; The Race; Scuderia Fans.