Haas

F1 2026Összértékelés: 4.7/10

Oliver Bearman

Aktuális +0.35 · Forma +0.08

Esteban Ocon

Aktuális +0.21 · Forma -0.02

Időmérős alap

4.4

Verseny alap

4.3

Autó jellemzők

Időmérős tempó

4.4

Versenytempó

4.3

Csúcsleszorítóerő

5.1

Gyors kanyarok

4.8

Lassú kanyarok

5.0

Egyenesbeli sebesség

4.2

Aktív aero hatékonyság

4.8

Gumikopás-kezelés

5.0

Tapadás

5.0

Fékstabilitás

4.8

Útfekvés

5.0

Energia-visszanyerés

5.0

Megbízhatóság

5.6

Haas occupies the precise center of the 2026 grid. The VF-26 has no attribute that genuinely stands out and no attribute that genuinely embarrasses the team. It is a balanced, reliable midfield car in an era when reliability itself has value. The one trait that nudges above average is mechanical dependability. The car finishes races, which is not guaranteed across the entire field. Bearman and Ocon bring modest but positive driver offsets to a car that rewards consistency over aggression.

Részletes elemzés

Being grid average in 2026 means Haas will score points regularly on circuits that do not punish any particular weakness, and will struggle when the circuit demands excellence in a specific area. The team's qualifying pace matches their race pace closely, suggesting the car has no particular setup characteristic that makes it dramatically better or worse at one phase of the weekend. For a team with the resources of Haas, finishing in the points consistently is achievable and represents genuine progress.

Bearman and Ocon are both comfortable, professional drivers rather than exceptional ones, and their results will largely reflect what the car can do rather than dragging it beyond its limits. The strategic battle for Haas is typically with the other rated-average and slightly-below-average cars rather than with the top tier. When any of those rivals suffer reliability problems or poor strategy calls, Haas is positioned to benefit. Consistency is their most reliable competitive weapon.

Fejlesztési idővonal

Round 0Pre-Season

4.9

Pre-season baseline — impressive for resources, Ferrari customer

race Pace 0.0traction -0.2quali Pace 0.0reliability +0.5ride Quality -0.2peak Downforce -0.2energy Recovery 0.0low Speed Corners -0.2tyre Degradation 0.0braking Stability -0.2high Speed Corners -0.2straight Line Speed 0.0active Aero Efficiency -0.2

Haas was 'probably F1's least-well-resourced team' making their testing performance 'seriously impressive' (The Race). Ferrari customer team. Bearman set 1:33.487 (+1.495s) — close to Gasly's Alpine and consistent with upper-midfield potential. Logged 1,271 total laps — third highest of any team — with no major reliability setbacks, hence reliability rated 5.5 as relative strength. VF-26's behaviour improved steadily through testing. Chassis attributes sit just below average, with performance metrics (qualiPace, racePace) at grid average reflecting competitive midfield pace. Bearman's P7 at Melbourne (offset +0.3, effective 5.2) consistent with this rating.

Australian Grand PrixBaseline

5.0

Round 1 baseline — best-of-the-rest with Bearman P7, solid operational weekend

race Pace -0.2traction +0.2quali Pace -0.0reliability +0.5ride Quality +0.2peak Downforce +0.2energy Recovery 0.0low Speed Corners +0.2tyre Degradation +0.2braking Stability +0.2high Speed Corners +0.2straight Line Speed -0.8active Aero Efficiency 0.0

Bearman P7 (best-of-the-rest) on successful 1-stop Medium-Hard. Both cars finished — strongest midfield reliability (6.0). Race pace median 85.406 (+1.908). Qualifying Q2 exit: Bearman P12, Ocon P13. No significant handling complaints. Speed traps average: Bearman 301.7, Ocon 304.9. Sources: Formula1.com, The Race, FIA speed trap PDFs.

Chinese Grand PrixWeekend Final

5.0

Round 2 — midfield leader, Bearman P5 from P10, faster than Red Bull on race pace

race Pace +0.5quali Pace +0.3peak Downforce +0.1

Haas was the best midfield team on race pace at Shanghai (1.243s off Mercedes), outpacing Red Bull (1.527s), Alpine (1.256s), and Audi (1.173s on single-car data). Bearman's P5 from P10 (+5 places) marks back-to-back strong point finishes (P7 R1). Rear impact structure winglet upgrade provides small aero gain. Ferrari PU continues to run reliably. Ocon P14 after 10s penalty for collision with Colapinto. Sources: Formula1.com, The Race.

Japanese Grand PrixWeekend Final

5.0

Round 3 — Bearman 50G crash at Spoon, Ocon salvages P10, poor degradation

race Pace -0.6quali Pace -0.2tyre Degradation -0.2high Speed Corners -0.1

Bearman DNF from 50G crash at Spoon Curve (lap 20) caused by active aero closing speed differential (45-50 km/h). Driver error, not car deficiency. Ocon salvaged P10. Race pace +1.999s (OCO-only data, BEA DNF'd early). Poor deg rate (-0.0535). Front wing straight mode actuation upgrade. Sources: Formula1.com, Autosport crash analysis, FastF1 data.

Miami Grand PrixWeekend Final

5.0

Round 6 (Miami) — quiet weekend, single floor winglet upgrade, deferring main package to Montreal

race Pace 0.0quali Pace -0.2

Single minor upgrade — floor winglet device for local downforce. OCO + BEA both ran clean weekend with no specific handling or pace breakthroughs cited in coverage. Long-run pace just behind Alpine. No incidents this weekend (reliability holds at 6.0 — still strongest midfield reliability). No car-DNA changes warranted on a single minor upgrade. Pipeline will reflect any racePace drift from raw data. Sources: The Race, F1.com.

Canadian Grand PrixWeekend Final

5.0

Round 7 (Canada) — 5-part upgrade deployed split, no visible improvement

race Pace -0.0quali Pace -0.5

Haas registered 5 parts (sidepods, rear suspension, engine cover, floor, rear corner). BEA ran the full package from FP1; OCO ran OLD spec for SQ + Sprint, upgraded for main qualifying + race (don't conflate OCO sprint data with the upgrade). BEA P10 race ('we didn't deserve P10 / chasing our tails all weekend'); OCO P14 ('upgrades not good enough'). FP1 leader on raw speed trap for OCO (331.7 km/h) but race pace 77.670 (gap 2.08s) was midfield-back. Big package didn't pay off — hold all car-DNA attributes, wait another round for trend.

Monaco Grand PrixWeekend Final

4.9

Round 8 (Monaco) - BEA brake failure DNF

race Pace -0.6quali Pace -0.5reliability -0.3

OCO P9 quali -> P9 race (steady); BEA DNF lap 27 with a brake failure (mechanical, team brake package - not a Ferrari-PU issue). reliability -0.3 (first Haas mechanical failure of 2026, monitoring). No car-DNA change (race pace 10th is Monaco-specific and low-sample). Note: two Ferrari-customer cars (BEA Haas, BOT Cadillac) lost brakes the same weekend - likely independent brake-package/cooling issues, explicitly NOT attributed to the Ferrari PU. Pace re-derived by pipeline. Sources: FastF1 round-08; F1.com.

Barcelona Grand PrixWeekend Final

4.8

Round 9 (Barcelona) - knife-edge setup window (entry instability); BEA electrical DNF L60

race Pace +0.2quali Pace +0.3reliability -0.4braking Stability -0.2

brakingStability -0.2: 'incredibly narrow setup window' with entry instability turning into mid-corner understeer (Bearman: 'the worst car I've ever driven' outside the window; The Race). Reliability -0.6: BEA electrical failure L60 = second Haas failure in two rounds (BEA brakes R8); softened from the strict -0.8 because PU-vs-chassis attribution is unconfirmed (Ferrari customer PU). Net -0.4 after re-center. OCO's Q1 energy-deployment problem treated as one-off operational, not logged. Grid reliability re-center +0.2 applied to all 11 teams (incident penalties pushed the grid reliability average to 4.33, breaching the +/-0.5 band; re-centered to 4.53, relative gaps preserved). Pipeline re-derives qualiPace/racePace from committed raw round-09; no manual pace override (dry, representative weekend). Sources: FastF1 round-09; The Race; Wikipedia.

Austrian Grand PrixWeekend Final

4.8

Round 10 (Austria) - back of the midfield; circuit-specific cooling parts only; clean weekend

race Pace +0.1quali Pace +0.3reliability +0.2

BEA Q13/P14 (1 lap down), OCO Q15/P16 (2 laps down). Only circuit-specific parts (two extra cooling louvre apertures - expect removal elsewhere - plus revised front brake duct). Coverage sparse; no car-DNA changes. R9 already applied the tier calibration (4.9 -> 4.8); Austria adds no new signal beyond confirming back-of-midfield race pace. BEA out-qualified OCO by 0.294 again (driver trend already priced). Reliability: clean weekend after BEA's R8/R9 failures; pattern watch continues; no recovery credit; +0.2 is the grid re-center only. Grid reliability re-center +0.2 applied to all 11 teams (R10 incident penalties pushed the grid reliability average to 4.36, breaching the +/-0.5 band; re-centered to 4.56, relative gaps preserved). Pipeline re-derives qualiPace/racePace from committed raw round-10; no manual pace override (dry, representative weekend). Sources: FastF1 round-10; F1.com.

British Grand PrixWeekend Final

4.7

Round 11 (Silverstone) - anonymous weekend; new rear wing deployed with no visible result

race Pace -0.1quali Pace -0.1reliability +0.1high Speed Corners -0.1

Anonymous: BEA P13 (hit by Albon lap 1 - innocent party, race pace discounted) / OCO P14; sprint P15/P16; race median 9th (+2.856), racing Cadillac rather than the midfield ahead. highSpeedCorners -0.1: below-rating showing at the definitive high-speed circuit (single weekend, softened for the BEA damage). Comprehensive new rear wing (fully revised profiles + refined endplates) confirmed deployed with no visible result - notable spend for Haas; watch Spa/Monza for payoff. Brakes/electrical pattern flag intact, no new event; +0.1 grid re-center only. Grid reliability re-center +0.1 applied to all 11 teams (R11 incident penalties pushed the grid reliability average to 4.45, breaching the +/-0.5 band; re-centered to 4.55, relative gaps preserved). Sources: FastF1 round-11; F1.com; Crash.net.