Kimi Antonelli

Mercedes
ANT
12
Current Rating
+1.04
Baseline
+0.77
Form
+0.27

2025 rookie baseline plus multiple 2026 poles, five wins in six mid-season rounds and the Silverstone pole + sprint-win weekend; R11 moved part of the surge into baseline - the trend is no longer just form..

Rating Changelog

Round 1
0.500.500.00

Melbourne confirmed the year-two step, but the pure baseline should stay below Russell after one weekend.

Round 2
0.500.67+0.17

China pole and victory justify a real uplift, but the biggest move should still sit in form rather than pure baseline.

Round 3
0.670.87+0.20

A second straight pole and win in Suzuka confirms Antonelli as the biggest positive trend on the grid after three rounds.

Round 7
0.970.99+0.02

Antonelli's 4th consecutive race win (R2 China, R3 Japan, R6 Miami, R7 Canada — first F1 driver in history to take his first 4 wins in succession). Small +0.02 form bump, not the full +0.05, because RUS retired from a battery thermal failure (lap 30) rather than being beaten on pace — qualifying gap was only 0.068s and ANT was 2nd on raw quali pace, so the win margin to teammate is contaminated by PU luck. Trend confirmed across 4 race weekends, sized conservatively.

Round 8
0.991.04+0.05

Monaco pole + lights-to-flag grand slam (5th win in 6). Unlike R7, the teammate margin was clean - ANT outqualified RUS by 0.394s on pace (RUS P6) and led every lap, so the +0.05 form bump withheld at R7 (RUS PU-contaminated) is now justified. Sized as form, not baseline - the surge still reads as a hot streak; revisit baseline if it persists.

Round 11
0.670.77+0.10

Silverstone pole + sprint win (youngest sprint winner ever) + fastest race lap while recovering from the lap-41 wheel-shield failure; out-qualified Russell by 0.370s - fourth consecutive clean weekend leading the team, championship lead 25 points. The R8 note said 'revisit baseline if it persists' - it has (R9 pole streak, R10 P3 + fastest lap, R11 pole + sprint win), so the +0.1 moves into baseline rather than form. Value 0.94 -> 1.04.

Best Current Circuits

Head-to-Head Comparisons